Compare protection
See how antivirus products performed in independent malware protection and security tests.
Compare protection, false positives and performance results from trusted labs.
Total must equal 100% before the weighting is applied.
Select a product row to view its individual lab results.
AV-SOFTWARE turns independent antivirus test results into a clear, customizable comparison. Instead of relying on advertising claims or a fixed editorial list, you can compare security products using published protection, false-positive and performance results from recognized test laboratories.
See how antivirus products performed in independent malware protection and security tests.
Strong detection matters, but so does avoiding harmless files and applications being blocked by mistake.
Use normalized results from AV-TEST and AV-Comparatives to compare the impact on system speed.
Select laboratories and test periods, adjust the weighting, and exclude products you do not want to compare.
The best antivirus software is not simply the product with the most familiar name. A useful antivirus comparison should consider current test data, malware protection performance and the number of false alarms. A product with excellent detection but frequent false positives may interrupt everyday work, while a balanced product can provide strong protection with fewer unnecessary warnings.
Use the Quick View menu for a ready-made comparison or customize the ranking to match what matters most to you. This makes it easier to compare Windows antivirus software using the same criteria across every included product.
Results from laboratories such as AV-Test and AV-Comparatives are often published across separate reports and test periods. AV-SOFTWARE brings the relevant figures together, while keeping the individual laboratory results visible beneath each product.
The ranking is calculated from the tests and weighting you select. Product positions are not assigned manually, so changing your criteria can also change which antivirus program ranks first.
The laboratories publish performance results on different scales. Before they influence the ranking, every raw value is converted to a comparable score from 0 to 100. A higher normalized score always means less impact on system speed.
points ÷ 6 × 100
For example, 5.5 points become 91.67 performance points.
(190 − Impact Score) ÷ 190 × 100
For example, an Impact Score of 8.5 becomes 95.53 performance points.
If several periods from one laboratory are selected, they are averaged first. The laboratory averages are then combined with equal weight. A laboratory therefore receives no extra influence merely because it publishes more frequently. Missing performance results are not treated as zero; they are reflected separately by test coverage.
Sources: AV-TEST scoring and AV-Comparatives Performance Test methodology.